SC refuses to stay Parrikar Oat taking ceremony

On March 14^th, 2017, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India refused to stay the oath taking ceremony of Manohar Parrikar before the Goa Legislative Assembly to be sworn as the Chief Minister of Goa. Furthermore, it ordered a floor test to be held on March 16^th, 2017.

Where it all began

At the completion of Goa Assembly elections on 40 seats, Congress party stood at 17 seats, BJP at 13, Goa Forward Party (GFP) at 3, Maharashtravadi Gomantak Party (MGP) at 3, Independent numbering 3 and NCP at 1. BJP got support from GFP, MGP and two independent MLAs and claimed majority before the Governer of Goa. Mridula Sinha, the Governor of Goa, invited BJP to form the government in the state. Congress filed the petition before the Supreme Court challenging the decision of Mridula Sinha.

Contentions of the Parties

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Congress, contended that the Governor failed to adhere to the mandates of the Constitution of India and acted in a mala Fide and arbitrary manner as he should have invited Congress, i.e., the single largest party in Goa to form the government. They also contended that BJP employed a late-night political maneuver and defeated the mandate of the people which was in favor of Congress.

Senior Advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Mridula Sinha, contended that the Governor was convinced of BJP’s majority while on the other hand, Congress failed to prove its majority. He also stated that the floor test will happen as soon as possible. Moreover, the swearing-in ceremony should go as planned, on 14^th March at 5 p.m.

The Verdict

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India J S Khehar observed that there is no rationale for staying the oath taking ceremony. It further stated that all the formalities required by the Election Commission to be completed by 15^th March and the floor test to prove the majority should be conducted on 16^th March at 11 a.m. Supreme Court cracked down on Congress by pointing out that “The Congress don’t have the numbers or else it would have proven its majority before the Governor. Everything is lacking in their plea and they haven’t approached the Governor to form the government.” It finally directed the parties to appoint a ‘Protem’ speaker to conduct the floor test.

WORLD’S MOST EXPENSIVE DIVORCE LAWYERS

Each party to marriage ties the knot with other with great hopes and expectations. Each party to the marriage has a right to enjoy the company of other for the solace of his life. But sometimes circumstances may arise and parties want to dissolve their marriage due to some reason or another. A divorce lawyer can help someone who wants to divorce his/her spouse. There may be some NGOs which can provide free legal advice. One can also seek a legal adviser online. In most of the cases, one has to pay a fee for hiring a lawyer for divorce. There are many divorce advocates in the world who charges a huge fee from their clients for lawyer consultation. Let’s have a look on the world’s most expensive divorce lawyers-

1. Laura Wasser- 

Laura Allison Wasser is a partner at Los Angeles-based firm Wasser, Cooperman & Mandles, established by her father, Dennis Wasser which deals in family law cases related to marriage, divorce and child custody. She joined the firm after graduating from Loyola Law School in 1996.She is one of the most expensive lawyers as she Charges $850 for an hour and requires a $250,000 retainer. It is alleged that Wasser typically only represents people who are worth more than $10 million. Laura Wasser has represented a number of high-profile celebrities in the past, including Johnny Depp in his divorce from Amber Heard, Britney Spears, Mariah Carey, Kim Kardashian West, Ryan Reynolds, Heidi Klum and more. She even represented Jolie in her divorce from Billy Bob Thornton in 2003.Angelina Jolie has hired Wasser to represent her as she has filed a divorce suit against her husband Brad Pitt where the main issue is related with custody of their 6 children.

2. Sandra Davis-

Sandra Davis is a partner and head of the Family Department of the London-based firm Mishcon de Reya, Davis charges £610 an hour and has represented celebrity clients such as the Princess of Wales, Jerry Hall, Thierry Henry and Tamara Mellon. With her 30 years of experience. Sandra specializes in complex high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth cases. She is a Fellow of International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyer. London Super Lawyers directory even named her one of the Top 100 Lawyers and one of the Top 50 women.

3. Fiona Shackleton (Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia)- 

Fiona Sara Shackleton is a partner in one of the London’s leading family law firms, Payne Hicks Beach which she joined in 2001. She has represented members of the British Royal Family and legendary Beatle, Sir Paul McCartney, and many more celebrities. Shackleton charges £640 for an hour plus £5k for an initial meeting.

4. Ira E. Garr- 

Ira E. Garr works with Slipe Garr, P.C. a New York based firm which deals with matrimonial issues. Garr has been listed as one of the “Best Lawyers in America” since 2008.Most of his clients are generally high net worth individuals and often celebrities, it is no wonder that Murdoch chose Garr to represent him in the $11.2 billion divorce suit with her third wife.

5. Liz Vernon-

Liz Vernon is a partner at family law firm Clintons based in London. She has over 20 years of experience. She has dealt with high profile clients from sports, media and entertainment fields and their spouses like Slavica Ecclestone and Karen Parlour.

Proving extra marital affair can be difficult in a court

Adultery is defined as a consensual sexual relationship between two individuals who are not married to each other. Since this kind of relationship is intentional, therefore under the eyes of the law, it is a criminal offence. It is also regarded as one of the major ground for divorce but proving it in the court is usually quite difficult. Usually, there is no direct evidence of adultery. It can ONLY be proven in the court with the help of circumstantial evidence i.e. objectionable pictures of a spouse with the third person. It can be proved more easily indirectly by placing their letters, SMS, emails etc. as evidence

Important points

1. The pleadings of allegations of adultery must be very clear and specific. 

2. The allegations must be substantiated with particulars such as timing, the name of other individual and proofs such as SMS, Photos, Email etc which specifically establish an act of sexual relationship post-marriage between the parties involved. Mere the intention to have such relationship in future can't constitute as ground for divorce

3. Mere a suspicion is not enough to constitute a ground of adultery. 

4. A single act of adultery can constitute as ground for divorce

5. The adultery offence comes under section 497 IPC. 

6. The Husband and wife both can lodge an offence under section 497 IPC against their spouse who has committed it. 

Statutory law Ref.: - 

1. Section 497 IPC 

2. Section 13(1)(i) of the Hindu marriage act 1955 

Important Judgments 

1. Vishwanath S/o Sitaram Agrawal Vs. Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal 2012(3) RCR(Civil) 702

2. Smt. Sadhana Srivastava wife of Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava daughter of Late Sri Parmanand Srivastava Vs. Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava son of Late Sri Shiv Shankar Lal AIR 2006 A ll7

3. Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. AIR 2015 SC 2612

4. Dipanwita Roy Vs. Ronobroto Roy 2014(4) RCR(Civil) 724

Do 

1. Disclose all details related to your spouse with the lawyer. 

2. Share all documents related to marriage. 

3. Collect and share all proofs related to adultery such as email, SMS, Pictures etc.