GST has been
here for barely a month and it has already been dragged to Court by a lawyer in
Delhi challenging the Govt Notifications imposing GST on the services of
lawyers. The petition was filed by Mr. J K Mittal citing that these
Notifications will have adverse consequences on lawyers in general; since the
effect of imposition of ‘reverse charge’ on services would mean that GST will
be collected from persons registered under one of the GST Acts (CGST, IGST or
Delhi GST Act) would have to pay the GST in respect of a service availed from a
person who is not registered under any of these Acts.
The Petition challenged the rules on the basis
that there is no corresponding provision or machinery in the system to
implement the rule, thus making is impracticable. The earlier Notification
stood for the exemption of liability of lawyers/Firms in respect of all services provided by them to clients and
only the client was to pay on the reverse-charge basis. He points out the
technical disparities between the wordings used in the subsequent
Notifications, in effect limiting the exemption only to representational
services rendered by lawyers to clients. an additional difficulty pointed out by
him is that the Finance Act had earlier required lawyers to register as
service-providers, but the subsequent change of bringing it under the
reverse-charge category did not bring with it any provision for
de-registration.
The number of
confusions raised by the apparently contradictory provisions on the earlier and
current schemes, and the various Notifications under GST, led the Delhi High Court to clarify in its order
that no coercive action should be taken against any lawyer or law firms for non-compliance
with any legal requirement under the CGST Act, the IGST Act or the DGST Act
till a clarification is issued by the Central Government and the GNCTD and till
further orders in that regard by this Court. The Court also stated that if an
appropriate clarification is not able to be issued by the Govt by the next
date, the Court will proceed to consider passing appropriate interim
directions.
For further
details and full judgment, subscribe to the Legal Resolved Repository Google
Drive by sending a request by E-Mail to legalresolvedrepository@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment